Recommandations


Gill P., Hicks T., Butler JM., Connolly E., Gusmão L., Kokshoorn B., Morling N., Van O., Parson W., Prinz M., Schneider PM., Sijen T., Taylor D. (2018), ‘DNA commission of the ISFG: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence – Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions: Part I: evaluation of DNA profiling comparisons given (sub-) source propositions.’, Forensic Science International: Genetics 36, 189-202 (ici)

Gill P., Hicks T., Butler JM., Connolly E., Gusmão L., Kokshoorn B., Morling N., Van O., Parson W., Prinz M., Schneider PM., Sijen T., Taylor D. (2020), ‘DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence – Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions. Part II: Evaluation of biological traces considering activity level propositions.’, Forensic Sci Int Genet 44, 102186 (ici)

Willis S. et al., ENFSI guideline for evaluative reporting in forensic science, European Network of Forensic Science Institutes, Dublin (2015) (ici)